Evidence · InspectionAI
Real output, and the claims we refuse to make.
Unretouched frames from a model in production — including the low-confidence ones — the labelling standard behind them, and what it will not do.
01 — Unretouched model output
What it draws, at the confidence it drew it.
23% and 25% are shown on purpose: a tool that only displays confident calls is not telling you how it behaves.






02 — Same model, same settings
Three grounds it was never retuned for.



03 — How it was taught
A model is only as good as the boxes it was shown.
The rejected frames matter more than the accepted ones.
Accepted placement



Rejected placement


04 — Boundaries
What it will not do.
Stated here rather than discovered in month two.
- A model only names the classes it was trained onThe class list is finite and defined up front.
- Two domains are deployed; the rest are trained in a pilotFastener inspection and adhesive peel analysis run today.
- An underperforming class is suppressed, on purposeOne fastener class fired on good parts, so it is switched off until retrained.
- It flags parts. It does not reject themNo actuator, no PLC write, no bin gate.
- It reports capability, not dimensionsDPMO, Z-bench and Ppk — not arithmetic on a measurement nobody took.
- Inconclusive is not a passAn empty frame is excluded from pass-rate arithmetic.
The number we do not publish
There is no accuracy figure anywhere on this site.
We have not measured one on your parts, and a number measured on ours would tell you nothing about yours.
Talk to INSAIT